During a recent House Oversight Committee hearing concerning the investigation into Hunter Biden's business activities, an exchange between Democratic Rep. Dan Goldman and IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley sparked controversy and fueled speculation about President Biden's involvement.

Goldman questioned Shapley about his testimony regarding Hunter Biden informing his father about potential business ventures. Goldman argued that this didn't necessarily imply Joe Biden's participation in these dealings. Shapley conceded this point but highlighted that the conversation itself demonstrated communication between father and son about business matters.

This exchange ignited a firestorm on social media, with conservatives interpreting it as an unintentional acknowledgment that President Biden's past denials of discussing business with his son might be inaccurate. Several prominent figures, including conservative radio host Mark Levin and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley, weighed in, suggesting that Goldman's line of questioning had inadvertently strengthened the case for further investigation.

Goldman responded to the criticism on Twitter, dismissing Turley's interpretation and reiterating his belief that President Biden had no involvement in Hunter's business affairs. He characterized the interaction as simply Hunter Biden asking his father to greet potential business associates, asserting that the President was unaware of the specifics of these ventures. Turley retorted, highlighting his own legal experience and criticizing Goldman for seemingly arguing both sides of the issue.

This incident resurfaces President Biden's previous assertions that he has never discussed business dealings with his son, statements he has maintained as recently as last month. The renewed scrutiny of these claims adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden's business activities and the potential involvement of his father.