The investigation into the tragic shooting of UnitedHealthCare CEO Brian Thompson continues, and while public speculation abounds, the actual investigative work is far more grounded in meticulous detail and data analysis. Detectives are combining traditional investigative methods with modern digital forensics to sift through a mountain of information. Let's examine some crucial starting points likely guiding investigators:

1. The Myth of the 'Hitman for Hire'

The notion of easily hiring a professional killer is largely a misconception. While contract killings do occur, they rarely involve stereotypical "hitmen." Investigators are less concerned with the killer's professional status and more focused on concrete data points that can lead to their identification.

Surveillance image of the suspect (NYPD)

2. The Crucial Timeline

Investigators are prioritizing reliable indicators over the influx of tips. Key questions include how the shooter knew Thompson's precise schedule, enabling them to be at the location minutes before the shooting. Did they have inside knowledge, an accomplice surveilling Thompson, or was the phone call captured in the released photo connected to the crime?

3. Recognizing the Target

The shooter seemingly identified Thompson from a considerable distance in less-than-ideal lighting conditions. This raises questions about prior knowledge or surveillance. How could they be so certain of their target, especially approaching from behind? A simple reference photo seems unlikely.

Image of a person of interest (NYPD Crime Stoppers)

4. The Power of Digital Data

A recovered phone, potential Uber records, and possible pre-shooting surveillance footage offer valuable digital breadcrumbs. Even a burner phone can reveal crucial communication patterns and connections to associates, potentially unveiling the shooter's identity. Digital footprints are often difficult to completely erase.

5. Facial Recognition Technology

While public frustration mounts over the lack of immediate identification, authorities may be strategically withholding information to maximize their chances of apprehension, especially if accomplices are involved. Facial recognition technology likely played a role in tracing the shooter's journey to New York, and its continued use could link the suspect to online profiles or government databases.

6. Traditional Forensics: Important, But Not the Immediate Focus

Fingerprints and DNA remain vital evidence, but their usefulness hinges on pre-existing records. While not immediately helpful for identification, they serve as crucial confirmation in later stages. Familial DNA, as seen in the Idaho case, could offer another avenue of investigation if the shooter has relatives in commercial DNA databases.

Beyond these key areas, investigators are exploring various other leads, including reported threats, protests against UnitedHealthCare, the unusual firearm used, and any litigation involving Thompson. Ultimately, the focus remains on tangible leads that can bring the perpetrator to justice. It is important to remember that amidst the investigative details, a life was tragically lost, and a family mourns. The NYPD is diligently working to solve this crime, and in today's interconnected world, it's increasingly difficult to escape the long arm of the law.