Drawing parallels to influential presidents like Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan, all recognized for their emphasis on naval power, radio host Hugh Hewitt highlighted the significance of maritime strength for global leadership. He recently discussed President-elect Trump's commitment to rebuilding the US Navy.

In a conversation with Hewitt, Trump underscored the importance of naval power, emphasizing the need for more ships. He acknowledged the current state of US shipbuilding, contrasting it with China's rapid production, and hinted at exploring alternative construction methods, possibly involving international collaboration.

Trump also addressed the issue of modernizing existing shipyards and streamlining the construction process. He criticized the Biden administration's alleged interference with ship designs, arguing that unnecessary modifications led to increased costs and reduced efficiency. He advocated for a more streamlined approach, sticking to proven designs to avoid cost overruns and delays.

Hewitt further probed Trump's plans for naval expansion, inquiring about his commitment to prioritizing this issue. Trump affirmed his dedication, indicating plans to closely monitor progress and make significant announcements regarding naval development. He reiterated the need for a robust fleet and suggested exploring various options, including international bidding, to expedite the process.

This conversation reveals a clear focus on bolstering the US Navy. Trump's approach, reminiscent of past "navalist" presidents, contrasts sharply with the current administration's focus on the "Green New Deal." Trump's background as a developer suggests a practical, results-oriented strategy for naval modernization, potentially involving a close working relationship with his appointed Secretary of the Navy, John Phelan.

Beyond the immediate goal of expanding the fleet, Trump's vision seems to encompass a broader strategy of reaffirming American military strength and global presence. His emphasis on naval power suggests a recognition of its vital role in maintaining national security and projecting influence on the international stage. This commitment, alongside his anticipated impact on the Supreme Court and economic policy, could shape a significant and enduring legacy.