A proposed California law has sparked controversy due to an amendment that could potentially classify parents who do not affirm their child's gender identity as child abusers. Assembly Bill 957, which recently passed the State Assembly, initially aimed to ensure courts consider each parent's stance on gender affirmation during custody disputes. However, a subsequent amendment broadened the definition of parental responsibility for a child's "health, safety, and welfare" to include affirming their gender identity.

This amendment raises concerns that parents who don't adhere to this standard could face accusations of child abuse and potentially lose custody. Critics argue this could lead to widespread accusations against parents who hold differing views on gender identity. The bill's co-authors, Assembly member Lori Wilson and State Senator Scott Weiner, have also championed other legislation related to LGBTQ+ youth, including requiring foster parents to affirm gender identities and proposing California as a sanctuary for minors seeking gender-affirming care without parental consent.

The amendment to AB 957, added on June 6th, modifies the California Family Code. If enacted, it would empower courts to remove children from parents' custody under Section 3011 if they are deemed to be denying the child’s gender identity. This has raised alarms with some conservative groups, who suggest it could be exploited by activist organizations to target parents. While a spokesperson for Senator Wilson attempted to alleviate these fears, stating affirmation is just one of many factors considered in custody agreements, the bill remains a subject of intense debate. A state senate hearing on AB 957 is scheduled for June 13th.