Both former President Biden and former President Trump face criticism for their recent pardons, with accusations of undermining the rule of law and setting dangerous precedents. The Washington Post condemned both presidents' actions, arguing that they perpetuate divisions and weaken legal processes.

Biden's preemptive pardons for family members and former administration officials were singled out as particularly concerning, raising fears of future presidents shielding their inner circles from potential prosecution. This move, according to critics, frames successors as adversaries and legitimizes preemptive pardons as a defensive measure.

Trump's pardons for individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol events also drew strong condemnation. Critics argue these pardons risk encouraging future acts of political violence by signaling tolerance for such behavior.

The Washington Post stressed that these pardons create a problematic precedent, suggesting that fabricated "exceptional circumstances" could justify pardons for associates and family, circumventing due process. While acknowledging the potential for prosecutorial harassment, the Post emphasized the constitutional rights afforded to every defendant, including a speedy trial, protection against self-incrimination, and the right to appeal.