Amidst the fervor of the 2024 election, Project 2025, once a prominent topic, has seemingly faded from the spotlight. With President Trump's victory and the subsequent establishment of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, the focus has shifted. Congressional DOGE committees, spearheaded by Rep. Aaron Bean (R-Fla.) and Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), have further solidified DOGE's presence, leaving Project 2025's role less clear.

Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, which published Project 2025, emphasizes that the current political landscape reflects the will of the voters. He highlights the public's mandate for dismantling excessive bureaucracy, aligning with President Trump and DOGE's current efforts.

Roberts dismisses liberal concerns about Project 2025, suggesting they are opportunistic attacks. He maintains that the American people are seeking genuine change and will not be deterred. Interestingly, President Trump himself has distanced his administration from Project 2025, despite its origins within the Heritage Foundation. Heritage leaders, however, deny any radical elements within the project, emphasizing its historical focus on organizational and policy matters.

Despite Project 2025's perceived dormancy, certain parallels emerge between its proposals and DOGE's actions. For instance, both address reforming the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a move that has drawn criticism from figures like Sen. Elizabeth Warren. While some media outlets have attempted to link DOGE directly to Project 2025, Roberts clarifies that President Trump and his team deserve the credit for DOGE's initiatives.

While Project 2025 advocated for a more moderate approach to USAID reform, DOGE seems to be pursuing more drastic measures. This difference in approach highlights the evolving nature of the conservative agenda under the Trump administration and the influence of figures like Elon Musk.

The narrative surrounding Project 2025, DOGE, and the Trump administration's actions underscores the dynamic interplay between policy proposals, public sentiment, and the personalities driving the political agenda.